Search for: "Rock v. State Bar"
Results 481 - 500
of 629
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2011, 1:41 pm
Eagle Rock Energy GP, et al., C.A. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm
As this Wired piece cleverly states, Twitter beta-tested a new feature without telling anyone: a spine. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:54 am
Anyway, a new podcast is available from the CCC's Beyond the Book site: it features a (United States) Suffolk University Law School event in which CCC’s Chris Kenneally speaks with entertainment industry attorney Patti Jones and advertising executive Lenora Cushing; the trio ponder on the way trends in music licensing are changing how rock bands achieve fame and fortune. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
See Maestas v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:33 am
If you have not heard of WikiLeaks, you must be living under a rock! [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:24 pm
See Hard Rock Cafe International (USA), Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:59 pm
Supreme Court will hear arguments in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:44 pm
., v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
In Rock Creek Park View LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:15 am
The House of Lords ruled in 2005 in the case of A & Ors v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:39 pm
Little Rock Cardiology Clinic, 551 F. 3d 812 (2009), dealing with federal ancillary jurisdiction in a health-care case; Arkansas Democrat-Gazette v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
The plaintiffs are the now common-place third party payers (mostly union pension funds) ("TPPs") who claim they paid too much for the drug in reimbursing prescriptions that doctors made for members of TPP plans.In addition to the consumer fraud claims we’ve mentioned, there are state antitrust claims (the issue mostly being whether indirect purchasers barred from recovering under federal antitrust law by Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:48 am
Or simply state there's a §109(e) exclusion. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 12:22 pm
’ Another photo was altered to depict Peake/Puke made up as a character in the rock band KISS. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 11:39 pm
In Philip v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:51 am
Accordingly, said the court, the retired police officers lacked a legally protected property interest to the health insurance benefits available to active City police officers under the controlling collective bargaining agreement.Noting that §243.303 provides that “A local government must make health insurance coverage available to retirees only if the government offers such coverage to current officers and employees,” the Circuit Court held that such a provision did not… [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
Dueling Videos – Join the ABA v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
Kesler, Kansas decision as to lack of authority of MERS; LaSalle Bank v. [read post]
