Search for: "Rodger May "
Results 481 - 500
of 648
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 12:17 pm
Ditto for Ds.Now, it may be that Rodgers in fact has standing; I don't know. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:17 am
He’s joining us May 20th and you won’t want to miss it! [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
Second, on 6 and 7 April 2011, Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke will hear Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
And thus Mr Coke-Wallis can continue to be a member of the Institute (“unfortunate” and “absurd” though this might be, in Lord Collins’ words): readers may feel that he is a lucky man. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:35 am
The appeal is due to be heard by Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
He was sentenced to 42 months in prison on 19 May 2006 but released on bail on 28 July 2008. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
This week there are three linked appeals to be heard in the Supreme Court from Monday 14 March to Thursday 17 March 2011 by Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Brown and Dyson: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
Charlie Sheen may accept an appointment as a mediator in the crisis in Wisconsin. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
May: Genocide: A Normative Account New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. xi, 283 pp. $85.00. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
Meanwhile in Courtroom 3, there are three murder cases listed in the Privy Council this week each to be heard by Lords Rodger, Brown, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am
In HM Treasury v Ahmed Lord Rodger had specifically contemplated that if an order had particularly serious consequences it may be acceptable provided “that it had only a limited life-span and was replaced, as soon as practically possible, by equivalent legislation passed by Parliament. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 10:51 am
There may be a lawsuit there. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:41 am
Lord Rodger also raises an intriguing point of statutory interpretation. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:30 am
If you’ve been considering enrolling, you may want to lock in the current tuition today. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:06 am
I suspect that Aaron Rodgers’ stock price is at an all-time high at the moment. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
But it is a potentially significant development – certainly far more significant than what Packers QB Aaron Rodgers had for breakfast this week (although Packer fans may disagree) – and the plaintiffs’ bar is unhappy with the result.The Wisconsin legislature packed a lot into this bill, but here are the highlights that we found particularly relevant in the drug/device context:(1) Punitive damages – capped at the greater of 2x compensatories or $200,000. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:56 am
Not the bread and butter fodder of this particular blog, but nevertheless an increasingly important addition to the celebrity arsenal in actions in the field of privacy – as seen, for example, from the comments of Lord Rodger in Re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] UKSC 1 at [22], who noted that there had been a “recent efflorescence of anonymity orders” on the back of such actions. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
He began by summarising the principles that apply whenever a claimant seeks an anonymity order or other restraint on publication of details of a case that would normally be in the public domain: (1) The general rule is that the names of the parties to an action are included in orders and judgments of the court. (2) There is no general exception for cases where private matters are in issue. (3) An order for anonymity or any other order restraining the publication of the normally reportable details of… [read post]
