Search for: "Rogers v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 1,514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2021, 1:32 am by Florian Mueller
, I thought I was done with that topic until the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit orders the fairly likely stay of the injunction. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am by Florian Mueller
Two new issues arose last year, however, and it's hard to tell which one is worse:the unbelievable power and money grab (with earthquake-like repercussions even on the Android side of the market) resulting from ad tracking (where Apple's self-preferencing is so very obvious), andthe way Apple's AirTags lend themselves to abuse by stalkers and thieves because Apple focused only on network effects instead of prioritizing the prevention of abuse.There's a chance that Apple will do… [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:36 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Judge Rogers concurred, reasoning that while a habeas judge has the power to order the release of a Guantanamo prisoner into the United States, that power should not have been exercised in Kiyemba in light of the offer of repatriation elsewhere. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
The United States Supreme Court has endorsed this approach. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
” At frESH, Danelle Gagliardi and Matthew Rojas analyze Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
State Legislative Developments States continued to pursue and enact new laws affecting the development, distribution and/or use of AI, expanding the legal patchwork of AI laws across the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:42 pm by J. Gordon Hylton
  In the United States, baseball has always been more than just a game. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:17 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:37 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:32 pm
Surely this is so in Israel, whose Supreme Court pronounced on targeted killings in Public Committee against Torture in Israel (2006), and in the United States, whose Supreme Court held in Hamdan v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Amy Howe
United States and suggests that the case “raises a difficult puzzle about why courts invalidate vague statutes that have clear applications. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
”  This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]