Search for: "Rose v. Rose"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,887
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2021, 1:06 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (covering Alabama, Florida, and Georgia) declined applying the “association” theory to a Florida state law prohibiting disability discrimination on the basis of association (Carolina Rose Matamoros v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 12:23 pm
Matisoff v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 12:05 pm
This question, as well as others including the application of the Formstein defence, was considered by Katfriend Henry Yang in relation to the recent case of Facebook v Voxer. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:10 am
A 2019 Supreme Court case, Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
It offers a historical critique of Justice Scalia’s dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 10:19 am
In Kedar Nath v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
Rose Mary Knick, the plaintiff in Knick v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm
But then Denise Dunleavy, of Weitz & Luxenberg, knowing that Shanklin was her listed expert witness in many cases, rose to say that her expert witnesses would rely upon the Shanklin study. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 7:54 am
After all, the Supreme Court had held in Fletcher v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 7:38 am
Rose, University of Arizona and Yale Law School, author of Property and Persuasion "A magnificent and exquisitely told story, replete with scoundrels and corrupt politicians, Lakefront solves the longstanding puzzle of the origins of the Supreme Court's famous nineteenth-century ruling in Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:30 am
Rose, University of Arizona and Yale Law School, author of Property and Persuasion "A magnificent and exquisitely told story, replete with scoundrels and corrupt politicians, Lakefront solves the longstanding puzzle of the origins of the Supreme Court's famous nineteenth-century ruling in Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 3:43 am
| Does the Irish Court of Appeal in Merck v Clonmel part ways from the CJEU's Santen Article 3(d) decision? [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 7:34 am
The case reference is Kaplan v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Rose U. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Rose U. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
Rose Hughes answered the question here. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:07 am
Lujan v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 3:30 pm
Rose, Inc. v City of Atlanta, 2021 WL 2010139 (GA App. 5/20/2021) [read post]
