Search for: "Russell v. U.s.*" Results 481 - 500 of 504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2008, 11:10 pm
  (Disclosure: Howe & Russell co-represents petitioner Jimenez). [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 2:08 pm
(Disclosure: Howe & Russell represents the petitioner.) [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:36 pm
(Disclose: Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner) Opinion below (3rd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 08-38 Title: Molski, et al. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 8:15 pm
Russell also relies on the Supreme Court’s 1985 decision in Liparota v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 3:11 pm
(Disclosure: Howe & Russell represents the petitioner in 08-108.) [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Branch    Western District of Kentucky at Louisville 08a0288p.06 2008/08/12 Russell v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:03 pm
On Tuesday, we filed this cert. petition in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
On appeal, his appointed counsel filed a brief, pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 11:16 am
(Disclosure: Howe & Russell represents the respondent.) [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:22 am
Defendant Ronald Russell Smith pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 7:37 am
     At issue in this appeal from the PTO's Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, was joint inventor Sullivan’s and Russell’s U.S. patent application Serial No. 08/405,454, which is directed to an antivenom composition. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 7:41 am
Russell, Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 12:20 pm
Because if s/he doesn't, then the expert's testimony might not address the relevant legal issues, and if (as here) it's off target, even a fraction, any resulting damage award may well be reversed.Which, in this case, costs Russell Christoff over $15 million. [read post]