Search for: "S. v. Social Security Administration"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's opinion noted that the Medical Board's determination conflicted with the finding of the Social Security Administration that awarded Petitioner disability benefits and Petitioner acknowledged "the finding of the Social Security Administration is not binding on the Medical Board [see Matter of Fusco, 136 AD3d at 451]". [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's opinion noted that the Medical Board's determination conflicted with the finding of the Social Security Administration that awarded Petitioner disability benefits and Petitioner acknowledged "the finding of the Social Security Administration is not binding on the Medical Board [see Matter of Fusco, 136 AD3d at 451]". [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:08 pm
The #Mehmo and the Schiff Reply: Perhaps social media overreacted a bit to the Trump administration’s refusal to declassify in full the current version of the Schiff Memo. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
In the late 1930s, when federal courts appeared reluctant to vindicate equal protection claims, the federal Social Security Board (later to become part of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare) took a more active role via its administration of federal grants for state-run public welfare programs. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:15 am
In a nutshell, Social Security's regulations do not permit or prohibit expert testimony by telephone. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:14 am
West v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
The court’s order in Missouri v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Justice Kavanaugh’s policy arguments borrowed heavily from Heckler v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court has also heard, or will hear, administrative law cases that will impact different aspects of securities litigation. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 6:17 am
This rule involves a five-day grace period to file an appeal from the final decision of the Social Security Administration (SSA). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:23 pm
Balliet v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:41 am
The Social Security Administration (the "SSA") had determined that the plaintiff was totally disabled, meaning that he could not perform any work, and the SSA authorized him to receive disability benefits from Social Security. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:45 am
The more we find out about the collusion that has been going on among the Biden administration, the security agencies and Big Tech, the more alarming it is — and the more unrepentant they are. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:20 am
R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2010 UKSC 54; [2010] WLR (D) 322 ”The only right to recover overpaid social security benefits paid according to an award was that conferred by s 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 which provided an exhaustive scheme for dealing with all overpayments made pursuant to benefit awards and applied only where there had been misrepresentation or… [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
’" The Appellate Division also addressed the various provisions set out in the Retirement and Social Security Law addressing “vesting” of a member's ERS benefits under certain conditions, none of which “conditions,” said the court, were applicable in Member’s situation [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 5:30 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:52 am
App. 67, 73-74 (1996) (“As part of the Secretary’s obligation to review a thorough and complete record, VA is required to obtain evidence from the Social Security Administration, including any decisions by the administrative law judge, and give that evidence appropriate consideration and weight;” citing Murincsak v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am
Yesterday’s decision in Lucia v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:24 am
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA) have teamed up to offer employers E-Verify. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:13 pm
The time it takes the Social Security Administration or the insurance company to make a decision is out of you or your attorney's control. [read post]
