Search for: "SAI INDUSTRIES CORP V US" Results 481 - 500 of 1,357
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
Let's take a closer look at each of these steps.I'm sure you believe me on (1) -- that Central Hudson applied the four-part Central Hudson test.Similarly, (2)'s beyond dispute, and Judge Callahan's opinion says so itself:  "On appeal [in Actmedia], we applied the test for laws that burden commercial speech set forth in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am by Eric Goldman
South American Restaurants Corp., No. 14-1698 (1st Cir. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
The EPA and Army Corps unveiled their long-awaited final Clean Water Rule on May 27, 2015. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 Grammy winner John Legend was one of many in the creative industries concerned that the  verdict could set a worying precedent for artists creating music inspired by others. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 12:15 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
While the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has conducted cyber attacks against the United States in the past, officials confirmed that “there has been a surge in such attacks coinciding with the arrest last month of Siamak Namazi, an energy industry executive and business consultant who has pushed for stronger U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 2:55 am by Florian Mueller
Kayak Software Corp., District of New Jersey:"DDR Holdings tells us that when a patent holder seeking to establish § 101 eligibility for an otherwise abstract idea points to a particular element of a patent's claims as solving a computer-centric problem, the claims must specify how that solution works. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
We draw attention to the following posts about the decision: Hawktalk shared their useful guide to understanding Safe Harbor, Schrems v Facebook in less than 300 words. [read post]