Search for: "SAM v. SAM" Results 481 - 500 of 2,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2020, 11:31 am by Robert Liles
Overview of Dental Claims Audits and Investigations by Medicaid and Private Payors in 2019 (March 4, 2020):  Many dentists and dental practices around the country are glad that 2019 is behind us. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Ryan Nelson] Order requiring independent agencies to notify OIRA of major regulations might prove a big step [Sam Batkins and Ike Brannon, Regulation; Cato Daily Podcast with Brannon and Caleb Brown] Biestek v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Today's opinion concurring in the issuance of the stay, also joined by Justice Thomas, comes in Dep't of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of New York State Off. of Victim Servs. v Raucci, 106 AD3d 1138, the Appellate Division, said it had found that CPLR 5205 (c) was superseded by the Son of Sam Law. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of New York State Off. of Victim Servs. v Raucci, 106 AD3d 1138, the Appellate Division, said it had found that CPLR 5205 (c) was superseded by the Son of Sam Law. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
Nevertheless, there are some admirable works including, very recently, Harvard Business School professor Eugene Soltes’s Why They Do It  and Duke professor (and former Enron prosecutor) Sam Buell’s Capital Offenses. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
Readers may remember the case of Ed Sheeran and Sam Chokri, discussed by this Kat back in August 2018 here. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Proximate cause principles offer a way to hold the line [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Sam Spiegelman on Cato amicus in Bank of America v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 7:25 pm by Francis Pileggi
’s amended complaint narrowed its underlying suit against him to post-employment breach of non-compete contract claims, in Carr v. [read post]