Search for: "SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL" Results 481 - 500 of 29,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2019, 9:03 am by Christopher P. Hahn
The Court of Appeal for the Second District of California recently affirmed the dismissal of a borrower’s claims for wrongful foreclosure alleging that the assignment of his mortgage to the foreclosing entity was invalid. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:05 pm
In a case that screams unreasonable refusal to rehire, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals (District III) upheld the circuit court's decision holding that an employer's terminating only the appellant after he was hurt on the job twice amounted to an unreasonable failure to rehire under WIS. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:24 am
July 13, 2012) (Second Appellate District), the California Court of Appeal held that conduct implied in the pleadings of the underlying claim, i.e. trade libel, is sufficient to trigger a duty to defend. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 2:32 pm by Sarah Baumgartel
Aug. 19, 2019), the Second Circuit—for the second time—reversed a district court’s imposition of more than 400 hours of community service as a special condition of supervised release. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:04 am by Michael Lumer
The losing party argues that the motion was indisputably drafted and served within the allowable period of time, and that the only reason it wasn't actually filed was because the district court's individual rules forbade it.What might the Second Circuit Court of Appeals do, you ask? [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 12:03 pm by Ben Allen
Since he had previously filed for relief before the district court that sentenced him, Wright filed his second petition in the Northern District of Ohio – the district in which he was imprisoned. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm by Matt C. Bailey
On November 12, 2010, the Second District (Division 5), in Bright v. 99¢ Only Stores, __ Cal.App. 4th __ (2010), overturned a trial court order dismissing a PAGA claim predicated upon Wage Order 7’s “suitable seating” requirement. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm
Personal Jurisdiction Treaty Jurisdiction Montreal Convention International Convention    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York No. 20-cv-2818  Appellant UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. was sued in the Southern District of New York and filed a third-party complaint against Appellee EVA Airways Corporation, seeking indemnification and contribution. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 12:15 am
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in Corder v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:25 am by Jeff Welty
On Friday, a panel of the court of appeals decided an interesting electronic sweepstakes case. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 10:33 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Patrick Ryan and Noah Finkel Earlier this week, the Second Circuit agreed to hear an appeal from the Southern District of New York concerning the impact of Comcast on wage and hour class actions. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 6:23 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But the Court of Appeals says the jury was able to find the officer actually had time to think about tasing the plaintiff before he did so a second time. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 5:41 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
In a recent case, the First District Court of Appeals in Florida issued an opinion in an appeal involving a benefits dispute between an employer and an employee. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by David Kopel and Randy Barnett
Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and 7th Circuit resulted in adoption of fair laws for bearing arms in D.C. and Illinois. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 1:00 am
For as long as I can remember, the Second District Illinois court has been known for not allowing oral argument. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 7:26 pm by Jill Gross
Last week, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of FINRA arbitration to a customer of a broker-dealer on the grounds of waiver. [read post]
The district court that heard the case granted summary judgment for the officers, holding that a reasonable jury would determine that the incidents at issue were appropriate uses of force, but the appeals court reversed that decision Monday. [read post]