Search for: "SELLERS v. SELLERS" Results 481 - 500 of 5,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2010, 9:02 am
The control that Tien Tsin was able to exercise because of trademark ownership, stock ownership, and near sole supplier status did not rise to the level of total domination that could justify holding it liable for torts committed by a separately incorporated entity, the court concluded.The decision is Campagnolo S.R.L. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am by Sean Wajert
  That a component seller knew or should have known that the product maker might use potentially hazardous materials in its design should never be sufficient to impose liability for the design that is the responsibility of the finished product seller. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 11:14 am by Craig Russell
In Pennsylvania, a three judge panel of the Superior Court recently decided that a jury may determine if a home seller is required to disclose a murder/suicide as a substantial defect in a home.In the case Milliken v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:54 pm by megan
 Bills being considered by both houses of the United States Congress may change that for certain remote sellers. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 3:47 am
In  Board of Supervisors for  Louisiana State University v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 10:47 pm
On this week’s Technology Liberation Front podcast, a number of IP luminaries discuss the UMG Recordings v. [read post]