Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE." Results 481 - 500 of 2,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2020, 1:30 pm by Karen Gullo
”For the decision:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-appeals-court-rulingFor more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states Contact:  AaronMackeyStaff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
”  Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
”  Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
”  Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am by Marty Lederman
  And, as some readers on Twitter have suggested, there are of course other possibilities here -- but all those they've identified would be even less legitimate; as I note below, the respondents and DOJ don't offer any justification for at least the panel's severability punt; and, at a minimum, the panel issued its substantively indefensible rulings without regard to the foreseeable impact on the nation's health markets.]The intervening defendant States, California,… [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Lucas Nanny, et al., 13 C 1260 SMY (In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:14 pm by Cannabis Law Group
That’s why we’ll be closely following the developments in the case of County of Santa Cruz et al v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 9:46 am by Matthias Weller
Junior researchers and the competition Junior researchers are asked to examine the relationship between European law and the family from a new, critical and prospective stand point. [read post]