Search for: "STATE OF NEW YORK v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2017, 9:45 pm
Greater New York Mut. 224 Conn. 313 (1992); Huggins v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:50 am
As a result, such waivers are currently legal in New York, Connecticut and Vermont. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:50 am
As a result, such waivers are currently legal in New York, Connecticut and Vermont. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:46 am
How Aaron Burr changed the Constitution [1] One of the best online introductions to the history behind the Loving case comes from its entry in the Encyclopedia of Virginia, http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Loving_v_Virginia_1967 [2] According to a 2013 online exhibit from the Library of Virginia, there are ten states that never had bans on interracial marriage: Alaska, Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
The two amicus briefs were filed by 17 attorneys general, including New York, Virginia, Maryland, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Ten other states—including California, Connecticut, Florida, Massachusetts and Texas—have similar laws prohibiting merchants from overcharging consumers on credit card transactions. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
In rejecting this tort, the court noted that it was joining an emerging majority of state courts to have considered the issue, including those in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Hawaii, Iowa, Pennsylvania, New York, and Tennessee. [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:09 am
" I don't think such a procedure exists in New York criminal law, but in Connecticut, a nolle prosequi is not an outright dismissal with prejudice. [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:49 am
In rejecting it, we join an emerging majority of state courts that have considered the issue, including those in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Hawaii, Tennessee, Iowa, Pennsylvania, and New York. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:17 am
“Saying It’s So, Doesn’t Make It So”—Independent Contractor v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:17 am
“Saying It’s So, Doesn’t Make It So”—Independent Contractor v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:27 am
(Claims under New York State law went to a jury, and the employer won.) [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
In ‘89, as a 1L, you signed up for an internship with a new offshoot of the then twelve-year-old D.C. think tank, the Cato Institute. [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:16 am
On May 18, Democratic Attorney Generals from the states of California, New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Washington, and the District of Columbia filed a motion to intervene in U.S. [read post]
12 May 2017, 8:24 pm
State of Connecticut Dept. of Educ. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:07 pm
And not only had Melngailis and her corporations not paid their employees, they had failed to pay the government: the State of New York claimed that Melngailis and her companies failed to turn over more than $400,000 in sales tax. [read post]
11 May 2017, 2:30 am
The N-word and other bigoted words towards African Americans, Jewish people, Iranians (after the Ayatollah Khomeini took power), and the list goes on, flowed effortlessly from so many people wherever I went in the North — including at workplaces — from Fairfield/Bridgeport, Connecticut, to Boston, to New York City. [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:36 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York refused to dismiss a claim for sexual orientation discrimination under Title VII in Philpott v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:01 am
Giardina On Friday, April 28, 2017, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed, in its entirety, John and Michele Clark’s asbestos personal injury action based on the doctrine of judicial estoppel. [read post]
