Search for: "STATE v BRADY"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,722
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am
Military judge Army Colonel James Pohl calls the commission to order at 8:59 AM, noting that none of the five detainees have chosen to attend this morning’s session. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 7:53 am
See, e.g., Brady v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Baker or Reno v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the so-called Brady rule, maintaining that at “the heart of this case is a conundrum implicating the ‘materiality’ standard,” and that courts “around the country have demonstrated a reluctance to grant defendants new trials under Brady, rendering the materiality standard a very difficult one for defendants to meet. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Panopticon has examined the judgements in the cases of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens & Ors and Deer v Oxford University. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm
Leibowitz then proposes a method by which the defense can destroy material obtained outside of discovery, while preserving any exculpatory or Brady material, by employing the framework used in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:50 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 10:01 pm
Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), or Giglio v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 12:01 pm
Supreme Court in Giglio v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm
App. at 251. [11] Brady v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm
App. at 251. [11] Brady v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Brady v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:07 am
With SB 783, State Sen. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
United States, a 1997 Supreme Court case holding that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 6:48 am
As you are aware, under Brady v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
One of the cases—Davila v. [read post]
