Search for: "STATE v LITTLE" Results 481 - 500 of 26,717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am by SHG
While the judges charged with deciding these cases will not be as easily swayed by appeals to the heart, they will be concerned with another aspect of this scenario that means little to you. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 7:31 am by Ryan Scoville
Peterman, who is a member of the Class of 2014: With a little over a year before the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, the United States has attempted to navigate complicated global crises without being drawn into additional conflict. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:09 am
The IPKat has heard from a discreet informant (he used to say he heard it from a little bird, but nowadays that makes some folk assume it was a Tweet) that there is a new reference for a preliminary ruling on an IP issue which will be furrowing the earnest brows of Europe's Greatest. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 2:19 pm
Because there is so little scholarly commentary out there on the constitutionality of the lethal injection protocol at issue in Baze v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
Moreover, he disagreed with the court of appeals holding that the voluntary intoxication instruction relieved the State of proving the requisite mental state. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  Any statute repealing EPA jurisdiction could also displace federal common law claims as well as pre-empting state common law claims (although the latter would be a little tougher). [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:13 am
Saul CornellDepartment of History,Ohio State UniversityThe recent decision in Parker v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
Some states seem to have requested an extension as a tactical maneuver with little intention of ever complying. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:38 am
  Little Pink House gives the backstory to the infamous Supreme Court eminent domain decision Kelo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
While it injects new uncertainty into formerly settled areas of habeas jurisprudence, Thuraissigiam ultimately decided very little. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 7:27 am
However, little-noticed language appearing in the Court's February 2008 decision in Riegel v. [read post]