Search for: "STATE v. AMARAL" Results 481 - 500 of 654
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
As Akhil Amar has observed, "[v]irtually no serious modern scholar - left, right, and center - thinks that [Slaughterhouse] is a plausible reading of the Amendment. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am by Joshua Matz
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar concurs with other commentators who have suggested that Jeffrey Toobin’s behind-the-scenes account of Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar discusses the Court’s summary reversal of the Ninth Circuit last week in the habeas case of Cavazos v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]
19 May 2011, 11:58 am by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
  But if each State is equally divested of power, arguably Article V is not violated because each State still has "equal Suffrage in the Senate," i.e., no suffrage at all. [read post]