Search for: "STATE v. CLEMENT"
Results 481 - 500
of 811
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard argument this morning in Christopher v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court in the matter of Christopher v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
• Florence v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
Briefly: At the New York Times, Kate Murphy interviews Paul Clement about his favorite movies, blogs, and brand of cycling shorts. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
” Wired reports on Bowman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am
You don't have to articulate an administerable standard any more than you did in Bush v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 12:49 am
Interestingly, Nollan v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
I missed the first one, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Monday’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:30 pm
The case is officially known as Florida v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
In 2005, the SG (then Paul Clement) filed a brief in the parallel case of McFarling v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
As Justice Kagan pressed Paul Clement, "it seems as though you're just talking about a matter of timing . . . . [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:36 am
In addition, some said Verrilli should have repeatedly focused attention on Court precedents like Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
Second, the contemporary practice of law in the United States is conducted largely in non-traditional environs, often with the use of sophisticated and highly mobile technologies. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
Second, the contemporary practice of law in the United States is conducted largely in non-traditional environs, often with the use of sophisticated and highly mobile technologies. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
Second, the contemporary practice of law in the United States is conducted largely in non-traditional environs, often with the use of sophisticated and highly mobile technologies. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:53 am
United States, and City of Boerne v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
To be sure, during the oral argument, Justice Breyer may have undermined the effectiveness of his hypo by appearing to agree with Michael Carvin (for the NFIB) that the argument for federal power in the inoculation case is of a piece with the argument for federal power in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:26 pm
In cases like the Court's 1936 ruling in Carter v. [read post]
