Search for: "STATE v. PATRON" Results 481 - 500 of 1,250
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2016, 11:41 am by Kevin
After four of the Outlaws pleaded guilty to beating up patrons of the Lizard Lounge, the State sought forfeiture of the vests on the grounds they had been used “directly or indirectly to facilitate street-gang activity. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 9:52 am by The Murray Law Firm
According to ABC 13, the shooting occurred “at the V Live Club in southwest Houston. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:16 pm by Michael Grossman
” In 1987, the Texas Supreme Court ruled in El Chico Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
Tostado and another patron of the Starbuck's chased Anderson to a car; during the course of the chase, Anderson backhanded Tostado. [read post]
The Plaintiff Is Injured Falling Down a Hill after Leaning on an Unsafe Fence Post The plaintiff in Wheeling Park Commission v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:15 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
By Joshua Scott Chilton, Legal Assistant & Receptionist, Woodruff Family Law Group On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States of America made a ruling in a case known as Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:52 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The Plaintiff Was in the Wrong Place at the Wrong Time and Suffered Serious Injuries as a Result The plaintiff in the case of Pittman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
But Engine raises pretty much the same issues as app developers face.Pro-Samsung #4: Hispanic Leadership Fund, National Black Chamber of Commerce, National Grange (rural communities)Minority advocacy groups Hispanic Leadership Fund and National Black Chamber of Commerce once again teamed up with the National Grange of the Order of the Patrons of Husbandry (advocacy group representing America's farmers and rural communities) to voice their specific concerns over outsized design patent… [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:02 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, the appeals court affirmed the district court’s holding that they were employees and not independent contractors (McFeeley v. [read post]