Search for: "SUMMERS v. POWERS"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am
In drafting this provision, Congress ostensibly believed it was preserving fair use and free expression but failed to understand how the new law would interact with technology in the real world and how some courts could interpret the law to drastically expand the power of copyright owners. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
There's a lot to be said for Justice Streeter's partial dissent in this case. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 6:56 am
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm
Congress has the inherent power to issue subpoenas, but, says two-thirds of this D.C. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:09 am
State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 1:01 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:10 am
Earlier this summer, EFF filed an amicus brief in People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:18 am
Supreme Court may well decide whether to review Federal Communications Commission, et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:06 am
Earlier in the summer, the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm
Earlier this summer, the US Supreme Court handed down a highly anticipated decision clarifying the powers of the Securities and Exchanges Commission in civil enforcement proceedings. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am
They built the power and air for us up until last summer.... [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:44 pm
Russo and Espinoza v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:46 pm
In Granny Purps v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm
Key Findings The fiscal responses to the COVID-19 pandemic will require policymakers to consider what revenue resources should be used to fill budget gaps. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
The vast majority of the demonstrations we have seen this summer are comprised of precisely the type of crowds the First Amendment is intended to protect—impassioned crowds, angry at abuses of governmental power, seeking redress and reform. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:42 pm
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon Straus summarized the latest developments in Trump V. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am
Espinoza is a powerful victory for pluralism, in both historical and present-day terms. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:05 am
The film explains that after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:13 pm
The Inforrm blog is now taking a summer break until the end of September. [read post]
