Search for: "SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC."
Results 481 - 500
of 1,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2020, 10:34 am
The VA decided that because Superior Optical had been performing under sole source contracts, the exception to the Consistency Act didn’t apply. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:50 pm
Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450), compels the conclusion the trial court erroneously based its decertification order on its assessment of the merits of Hall's claim rather than on the theory of liability advanced by Hall. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:37 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois certified a class in a consumer privacy lawsuit against comScore, Inc. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:13 am
APL also received two “Satisfactory” adjectival scores and one “Superior” score. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 10:48 am
The Superior Court judge ruled that the companies could not satisfy the “B” part of AB 5’s “ABC” test, which requires that the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business in order to be treated as an independent contractor. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 6:56 am
A recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice touches upon a little discussed area of employment law. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:12 pm
In April 2016, we reported that an Ontario court had upheld a police production order requiring Vice Media Canada Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:21 pm
Superior Court, but the Court of Appeal agreed with the trial court's analysis that the correct legal standard for rest and meal periods is whether the employer provided them to employees. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:23 pm
Superior Court, 31 Cal.App.4th 1206, 37 Cal. [read post]
31 May 2018, 10:58 am
Superior Court of L.A. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:38 am
CAE Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
CAE Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
Superior Court (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 864, 876, 269 Cal.Rptr. 647; Grant v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 7:48 am
Biogen, Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm
Dyson, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:06 am
CPS Security Solutions, Inc. case, about which we wrote here, the Court concluded that “although on-call hours constitute ‘hours worked,’ remaining available to work is not the same as performing work. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:06 am
CPS Security Solutions, Inc. case, about which we wrote here, the Court concluded that “although on-call hours constitute ‘hours worked,’ remaining available to work is not the same as performing work. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:17 pm
In that case, the plaintiffs allege that their superiors told them that if they had to work extra hours to meet the company’s performance goals, they should do so but would not receive additional compensation. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:20 pm
Brokerage Concepts, Inc., the Pennsylvania Superior Court adopted the Restatement on this issue, concluding that " true statements may not be the basis for a claim of intentional interference with contractual relationships. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:31 am
Brokerage Concepts, Inc., the Pennsylvania Superior Court adopted the Restatement on this issue, concluding that " true statements may not be the basis for a claim of intentional interference with contractual relationships. [read post]
