Search for: "Sales v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 8,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2020, 1:01 pm
Jolly, executed a bill of sale selling the X-Ray unit to Dental Dynamics. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
-copyrighted works made or previously sold in the United States with the authority of the owner. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:19 am
As technology expands sales of many United States companies outside of the United States the Lanham Act can be an effective tool to combat the sale of forgeries. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:43 am
Courts have split over the meaning of "lawfully made under this title," with some holding it means "legally manufactured... within the United States," CBS v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:01 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States granted a writ of certiorari in Christopher v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am
Editions authorized for sale in the United States are of the highest quality, and are printed with strong, hard-cover bindings with glossy protective coatings. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
Auld Company v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993).Customs cites many difficulties with the application of the First Sale Rule as the reasons for the proposed change. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:55 pm
Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993). [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:51 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a major decision interpreting provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA), specifically the AIA on-sale bar provisions. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
The key question was whether the "lawfully made under this title" language of the first sale section refers to items that were physically made in the United States or whether it encompasses copies that were licensed by a United States copyright holder but manufactured abroad. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm
For a wonderful analysis of what the Court did and did not do in Stevens, be sure to catch Matthew Liebman’s post on the Animal Legal Defense Fund Blog, Clarifying the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 12:25 pm
Supap Kirtsaeng, a Thai citizen who came to the United States in 1997 to study mathematics, asked friends and family in Thailand to buy the English-language versions of his textbooks in Thailand, where they were cheaper and mail them to him. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:01 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision, , Tyler v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:00 am
Cir. 2012); State Indus. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
” Simply put, this means that no member of the United States government is above the rule of law. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
Medinger Source of Law: United StatesLegal Claims: OtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the District of MarylandLegal Counsel: Ezra Gollogly; Paul A. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:30 am
Per United States v. [read post]
Special Master: Vincent J. Poppiti: Discovery Dispute over Production of Worldwide Sales Information
5 May 2010, 9:33 am
This discovery was not limited to products known by the defendant to enter the United States, but instead covers all worldwide sales, regardless of whether the defendant knows where its products are going. [read post]
