Search for: "Shaw v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:43 am
“The Court clearly affirmed that Congress’ intent for the RFS from the very beginning was to crack the petroleum monopoly and to push biofuels into the marketplace,” stated Monte Shaw, IRFA Executive Director. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 4:16 pm
The case is Haligowski v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Jurisdictional facts must be alleged and proved by a “preponderance of the evidence”; the phrase “reasonable probability,” when first introduced by the Seventh Circuit in Shaw v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
The case is Keiffer v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
My FindLaw column, which will appear (here) later today, discusses the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
The case is Matrix Basement Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 5:09 pm
Cir. 2022), overruling Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
On a 5-4 vote, Shaw v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
Shaw & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
Shaw & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
***Seyfarth Shaw's Trading Secrets blog has an excellent summary of the trade-secret status afforded customer lists. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:12 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 2:39 pm
DuPont v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
The California Chamber of Commerce filed a friend-of-the-court brief prepared by Greg Valenza of Shaw Valenza in this case. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:11 am
In Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate it was stated, by Judge Posner, that it was impossible to “find any basis in statute or case law for extending a copyright beyond its expiration. [read post]