Search for: "Smith v. Smith State Prison"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Smith, 131 P.2d 36 (Cal. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:27 am
Since at least 1924, when the Supreme Court endorsed it in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Randy Smith accusing the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable". [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:08 am
Despite risk of retaliation, Tatyana and the other plaintiffs in Fields v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
Alvarez v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:49 am
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:15 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm
The agreement stated that she faced a 20-year prison sentence, but if she fully cooperated and abided by the terms of the agreement the government would recommend to the court that her sentence be reduced to 3 years’ probation. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:45 am
The district court sentenced Elonis to 44 months in prison and additional 36 months of supervision following his release. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
If a state does, RLUIPA would be, because it applies to all state institutions (from hospitals to prisons). [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Smith. 22 Journal of Law & Policy 483-766 (2014). [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am
Brownstein, Constitutional Myopia: The Supreme Court's Blindness to Religious Liberty and Religious Equality Values in Town of Greece v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:37 am
The opinion begins (emphasis added):When a state prisoner seeks federal habeas relief on the ground that a state court, in adjudicating a claim on the merits, misapplied federal law, a federal court may grant relief only if the state court's decision was "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm
This was in the case of Claire Page v Woodely and Earley Chronicle. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:09 pm
In that case, Shapero v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
This is not a case where the state judges were confused about the law or overlooked key evidence, as in Taylor v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm
In 2003, the Supreme Court articulated in Smith v Doe a two-step analysis for examining a challenged statute on the grounds that it violates the Ex Post Facto Clause. [read post]
