Search for: "Smith v. U.S. Government (Department of Justice)"
Results 481 - 500
of 602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am
Courtney Kube and Alexander Smith report for NBC News. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Curiously, the majority lineup in this per curiam opinion, includes the Chief Justice and both Justices Kennedy and Alito. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Here, no valid penological purpose existed as to the alleged acts of the Sheriff’s Department. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 12:30 pm
In its 2020 decision Tanzin v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:42 am
A decision in the Ohio case, Smith v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
But in North Carolina, U.S. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:08 am
Department of Justice. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
The judgment in the case of Smith v Jones [2020] NSWDC 262 was given on 28 May 2020. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm
Smith-Green Community School Corp. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (Chief Justice Crampton, R. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
The government has acquiesced in the grant and confessed error, so it looks like Sotomayor, as circuit justice for the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 26 July 2022, there were hearings in Dyson v MGN Limited before Nicklin J and Smith -v- Baker and another before Griffiths J. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
A panel of the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Earlier this year in Yates v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:27 am
My focus was on two U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am
Finally, a review of the details of the decision follows: Background of Pyott case: In September 2010, Allergan, Inc. entered into a settlement with the United States Department of Justice and pled guilty to criminal misdemeanor misbranding and paid a total of $600 million in civil and criminal fees. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Gravel v. [read post]
