Search for: "Smith v. U.S. Government (Department of Justice)"
Results 481 - 500
of 602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
Department of Treasury, 11-45, which was relisted after the October 7 Conference. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
The Court may be holding it for Smith v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:38 am
" Smith v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:38 am
” Smith v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:38 am
” Smith v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
The government is represented by Assistant U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
The government is represented by Assistant U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:57 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
UPDATE -- I missed the continuation of the footnote on the next page:The primary circumstance cited in the government’s motion is that Attorney General Eric Holder has changed the Department of Justice’s policy on whether the Fair Sentencing Act applies to cases in which the defendant was sentenced after enactment of that legislation. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm
Smith-Green Community School Corp. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaJustice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice H.L. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
This is, of course, precisely what the U.S. government, as the plaintiff in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:29 am
For example, the Department of Justice prosecuted Lauren Stevens a former associate general counsel of GlaxoSmithKline for obstruction of justice. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
Zuress and Weatherill presented the question whether “dual-status technicians” who perform civilian roles within military departments may sue the government for employment discrimination under Title VII; Witt relatedly asked the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:46 am
The State of Ohio sought review of Smith by the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:16 am
Government may afford religious institutions exemptions from certain laws in order to protect religious freedom, but is not constitutionally required to, according to the landmark case of Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:08 am
Department of Justice. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am
Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
