Search for: "Stand Up for California! v. California"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,418
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Regulatory dominoes remained standing. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Regulatory dominoes remained standing. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 8:04 am
EFF stands with protesters against police abuse, and stands up for the core rights to privacy, speech, and protest threatened by police surveillance. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 12:50 pm
But, due to the influence - up till now - of Roe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 3:50 pm
And from today's Report and Recommendation in Hubbard v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
Dissent: This disrupts the whole scheme Congress set up. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
The registrant already submitted costs of $14k, which it seems likely to get if this result stands. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am
The law disincentivizes email service providers from blocking spam on the basis of these exceptions, though, by providing a private right of action to those “injured by a violation of this [provision] arising from the transmission of an unsolicited or commercial electronic mail message” and entitles them to statutory damages up to $25,000 a day their message is unlawfully impeded. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 5:29 am
So we summarize one case, Mayrink v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 11:44 am
California disagrees.The panel opinion by Judge Collins holds that (1) the case isn't moot -- even though schools are no longer closed -- due to the "voluntary cessation" doctrine and the fact that schools might perhaps be closed again were COVID to flare back up; (2) the cessation of in-person instruction at public schools was fine, but (3) the order stopping in-person instruction at private schools was unconstitutional. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:57 pm
— On Monday, December 6, at 10 am ET, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), standing up for public access to courts and transparency in patent litigation, will urge a panel of judges to unseal documents that a notorious patent troll is trying to hide. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 12:44 am
Briefing concerning Apple's appellate motion for a stay of the Epic Games v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 11:59 pm
In Chong v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
The most recent case finding that such testers do not have standing is Shumway v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
The damages stand. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:37 pm
I'm sure Apple would not offer "sweeter" terms in that hypothetical scenario of Epic enforcing its consolation-prize injunction (again, I think the injunction will be stayed, and I don't think the anti-anti-steering injunction based on California UCL is all that solid).The difference is just that the Epic Games v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 3:36 am
I'm grateful to Assembly Majority Leader Eloise Gómez Reyes for her leadership in spearheading AB 685 to stand up for California's essential workers during these unprecedented times. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
Partnership v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 4:48 am
Here is the petition in Stand Up for California! [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:58 pm
(Stevenson Real Estate Services, Inc. v. [read post]
