Search for: "State of Montana v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 1,059
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2016, 6:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
S.3013: A bill to authorize and implement the water rights compact among the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Indian Reservation, the State of Montana, and the United States, and for o ther purposes. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The Montana Supreme Court explicitly rejected Citizens United and refused to invalidate this state law. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:01 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Federal Trial Courtshttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2016dct.html State of Texas v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Rory Little
Meanwhile, modern precedents such as the Court’s 1971 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:55 pm by Amy Howe
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Ian Gershengorn tried to turn the case around. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
United States and United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am by Rory Little
Justice Kagan pointed out that in a prior case (United States v. $8,850, a 1983 forfeiture case), the Court had ruled that “we’re going to do a due process analysis, but we’re going to take the [Speedy Trial Clause] Barker factors as our test. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:06 am by Rory Little
Applying due process principles under Montana state law as well as United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm by David Strifling
Briggs, 229 U.S. 82, 88 (1913)). [4] United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In Avon State Bank, David Gibson, a man who purported to be the son of a business associate of Ambrose Herdering, a customer of Avon State Bank, sought out the assistance of Herdering in moving the estate of Gibson’s deceased father from the Netherlands to the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:14 am by Robert Kreisman
  Voting in America is a precious right; eligibility is established in the United States Constitution, its amendments, by state laws and by various acts of Congress. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Finally, Justice Scalia wrote the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by Donald Thompson
 We know that to be constitutional, presumptions must be permissive, not mandatory (Sandstrom v Montana, 442 US 510 [1979]). [read post]