Search for: "State of Ohio v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 4,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:16 am
United States as a big step towards repealing the exclusionary rule the Court crafted in 1961 in Mapp v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 8:57 am by stu@crimapp.com
In New York v Belton, the high court extended the protective sweep rationale of its earlier ruling in Terry v Ohio to the motor vehicle. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
Earlier this month, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio denied motions to dismiss filed by 3M Company, DuPont, Chemours, and other chemical companies in a putative class action lawsuit relating to exposure to PFAS chemicals. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:02 am by Jon Hyman
If, however, a discharge that jeopardizes a clear public policy articulated in the Ohio or United States Constitutions, federal or state statutes, administrative rules and regulations, or common law may create a cause of action for wrongful discharge in violation of that public policy. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 4:57 am by Jon Hyman
United Telephone Co. of Ohio [pdf], is not an employment case. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:37 am by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Medina, OH, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]