Search for: "State of Utah v. Law" Results 481 - 500 of 2,459
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2020, 5:56 am
Jorge Contreras, University of Utah,  is arguably one of the most prolific scholars in the field of standardisation law. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:20 am by Amy Howe
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on February 10, 2020, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Seila Law v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 5:12 pm
United States, 498 U.S. 192, 193 (1991); United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 7:09 am by Tyler Green
Green is solicitor general of the state of Utah, which joined a 13-state amicus brief supporting the petitioner in Seila Law v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm by ricelawmd_3p2zve
States including Utah and Colorado bar a party that’s 50 percent or more to blame for a wreck from making a recovery. [read post]
Utah was the most recent state to execute someone by way of firing squad, which occurred in 2010. [read post]
Utah was the most recent state to execute someone by way of firing squad, which occurred in 2010. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Brian practices in all areas of domestic law and was a contributing editor to the Utah Journal of Family Law. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 8:51 am by John McFarland
The Alta Mesa court applied Oklahoma law and the Badlands court applied Utah law – but the tests for whether a contract imposes a real property covenant in those states are the same as in Texas. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm by Kevin Kaufman
The new federal tax law shifted to a policy of immediate and full deductions for investment in machinery and equipment, and Kansas conforms to this, affording these investments the proper tax treatment. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
EPA (Cultural Resources; Trust Relationship) United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Now the full circuit en banc (over a dissent) has dismissed the case on standing grounds without deciding whether disparate racial impact can taint otherwise neutral laws [Lewis v. [read post]