Search for: "State v. Amaral"
Results 481 - 500
of 642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Clapper v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In one case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:30 am
Indeed, a state official (think of Rick Perry) might quite explicitly say that he is not willing to subordinate his loyalty to the state constitution to the national Constitution, either on (reasonable) grounds that the Constitution is radically defective (which it is) or less reasonable grounds that he is no longer sure he wants to affirm the very notion of Union that the Constitution instantiates. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:08 am
Likewise, Amar says, liberals should embrace DC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:15 pm
Vikram Amar, Are Statutes Constraining Gubernatorial Power to Make Temporary Appointments to the United States Senate Constitutional Under the Seventeenth Amendment? [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
For example, in the famous and controversial case of Rust v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
In Holden v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:08 am
Lochner v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:06 pm
Amar’s approach also renders much of Section 2 of the Amendment superfluous. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:11 pm
Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging) In a recent posting, Ilya Somin says the following: “Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm
United States (invalidating a law banning employers from prohibiting their employees from joining unions) and Adkins v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:03 pm
Lochner v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm
Here is what I say about this precise topic in Chapter 4 of my new book, in my discussion of the landmark Warren Court opinion of New York Times v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am
The book also offers a reading of Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:01 pm
(Perhaps South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am
Dukes and AT&T v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
