Search for: "State v. Backer" Results 481 - 500 of 553
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2010, 12:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Both cases carry the title Perry v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 5:34 am by INFORRM
FIO Act 2000, s 43 (prejudicial to commercial interests): Please download: Michael Garrard v IC EA/2009/0107. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 8:48 am by Josh Wright
Under this initiative, there is not going to be anything in place state run. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Prop 8 backers’ appeal is Perry, et al., v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Judge Walker treated it as a strong indication that the Proposition 8 backers had no “standing” to appeal in the absence of an appeal by state officials. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:59 am by Lyle Denniston
  For that, they relied on the Justices’ one-line ruling on Oct. 10, 1971, in Baker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
May, decided in 1987, and Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
The judge relied quite heavily upon a 1997 decision by the Supreme Court — Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:47 pm by Lyle Denniston
At the Circuit Court, the case (Perry, et al., v. [read post]