Search for: "State v. Bays"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:53 pm
The United States Trustee announced the appointment of an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors for South Bay Expressway, L.P. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:32 am
Lastly, in Bay Point Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
Circuit Court to reconsider a ruling rejecting claims of torture and religious bias against detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:06 am
Joan Dachs Bais Yaakov Elementary School-Yeshivas Tigeres Tzva v City of Evanston, 2015 IL App. (1st) 121809-U (unpub. 3/6/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.state.il.us/court/R23_Orders/AppellateCourt/2015/1stDistrict/1131809_R23.pdfFiled under: Current Caselaw, RLUIPA Tagged: religious uses [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm
(Discrimination; Class Action; Added Parties) United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:56 am
Michigan v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Mission Bay Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:20 am
Revock v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:26 am
Kantor & Kantor won a notable victory against the Life Insurance Company of North America (also known as “LINA” or “Cigna”) in Elliott v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:08 am
On December 14, 2016, the California Supreme Court denied review and ordered depublished the Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion in Bay Area Clean Environment, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 7:58 am
Casco Bay Finance Company, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
State Air Resources Board (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th. 681. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm
In Bivens v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm
Harrington (Prisoner Civil Rights)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlHwal'Bay Ba J Enterpises v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
As a result, the presiding Kings County Supreme Court Justice granted the defendant’s request and directed that all liens be vacated and that the horses be returned.On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, agreed with the court below, noting that because JBRA failed to competently show that any bonafide expenses remained outstanding, the vacatur of all liens and the direction that the animals and equipment be relinquished were affirmed.They certainly needed to stop horsing around… [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm
Arch Bay Holdings v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:42 pm
This hearing takes its name from the 1971 Florida Supreme Court case of Richardson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
The government has filed its reply in support of its July motion for a stay pending appeal in Hatim v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:10 pm
The government relies, as it did in the court below (and as the district court did), on the 1949 case of United States v. [read post]
