Search for: "State v. Combes " Results 481 - 500 of 630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
” Doing a little research on my own, it seems to come from an English contracts case Combe v Combe [1951] 2 KB 215 dealing with promissory estoppel. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:04 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Wasserstein & JP Ellison —In a recent JAMA editorial (unfortunately behind a paywall), three authors called for increased use of the Park Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine, under which senior level officials at a company can be held liable under a strict liability theory even if they were not involved in, or even knew about, the alleged violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The notice states that “The Appellants wholly discontinues this Appeal on a without costs basis on consent. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:20 am
In India, a part of this area is codified in sections 68-72 of the Contract Act, 1872, and  some outstanding judgments of the High Courts, particularly before and around the 1950s (see for example Damodara Mudaliar v Secretary of State for India, Nallaya Goundar v Ramaswami Goundar and Maniagaran v Maniagaran), contain valuable accounts of how, if at all, the common law principles have been modified by the Indian legislature. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Combs presents “an excellen [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Jonathan Wood
Recently, seventeen states urged the Court to use California Sea Urchin Commission v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Thanks again to Tom Mitsch for combing the docket to find these cases. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:01 am by Transplanted Lawyer
There are two meaty things to note about the opinion in Perry v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  It is important to comb through the range of interests or goods that are protected by the modern criminal law through public lawyers and find ways to ensure that they act ethical at all times. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  It is important to comb through the range of interests or goods that are protected by the modern criminal law through public lawyers and find ways to ensure that they act ethical at all times. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:19 pm by Florian Mueller
Comments on social media--or even court filings, such as in Coronavirus Reporter v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 12:15 pm
  We’ve combed through each page, paragraph, and sentence. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
McKinney then became “extremely combative” and “charged towards the [officers]. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]