Search for: "State v. Cotton" Results 481 - 500 of 536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:25 pm
  Under the [governing statute], a state-court decision can be set aside on federal habeas review only if it is "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:29 am
" It is seemingly defined as Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart said of pornography, "I know it when I see it" in Jacobellis v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:26 am by Carter Ruml
When the facts are as unfavorable to the taxpayer as they were in Estate of Malkin v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[33] To support its position that the balancing requirement does not apply to ETSs, OSHA relies on the Supreme Court’s reasoning in the 1981 Cotton Dust ruling.[34] However, while the Court in that case did hold that a cost-benefit analysis is not required with respect to § 6(b)(5) permanent standards, it did not address whether such an analysis is required with respect to § 6(c) ETSs.[35]Notably, in an ETS challenge decided after the Supreme Court’s… [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Divisional Court recently released a decision in Greenpeace Canada v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 2:02 am by Florian Mueller
That's why I have filed patent applications for three inventions this year as opposed to just relying on copyright.Oracle v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
“It is critical that the state not offer carbon credits for business-as-usual management by timber companies or, worse, encourage clearcutting and other destructive logging practices while doing nothing to address the immediate impacts of climate change. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm by Gordon Ahl
Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) for a discussion on The Global Hostage Act. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:59 am by Jeff Marshall
    (4) In the case of a resident who has not been adjudged incompetent by the State court, any legal-surrogate designated in accordance with State law may exercise the resident's rights to the extent provided by State law. [read post]