Search for: "State v. Cox" Results 481 - 500 of 1,034
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Bradley County Board of Educat    Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga 08a0586n.06 David Cox v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Ann Marimow and Erin Cox for The Washington Post, who report that “[a]dvocates for redistricting reform in Maryland see Frosh’s appeal as a chance for the Supreme Court to spell out clear rules that would apply to every state in the country. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
On appeal, his appointed counsel filed a brief, pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 3:41 pm
Noel Cox, The Continuing Question of Sovereignty and the Sovereign Military Order of Jerusalem, Rhodes and MaltaPaul Harpur, Regulating Multi-national Corporations through State-based Laws: Problems with Enforcing Human Rights Torts under the US Alien Tort Statute [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:09 am by Adam Wagner
As Mrs Justice Cox made similar points in the December 2009 incarnation of this dispute (British Airways Plc v Unite the Union [2009] EWHC 3541 (QB) (17 December 2009)), saying that she was bound by that decision and could not therefore go behind it in order to declare that the statutory framework ran contrary to the Human Rights Act. [read post]