Search for: "State v. D. S."
Results 481 - 500
of 43,292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2011, 1:52 am
Kasprzak v Warsaw Regional Court, Poland; Bingham v Trial Court No 4 of Marbella, Spain; Wilson-Campbell v Court of Instruction No 4 of Orihuela, Alicante, Spain [2011] EWHC 100 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 35 “Article 23 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member states, as implemented by s 36(3)(b) of the Extradition Act 2003, contemplated the possibility of… [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 11:46 am
Even still, EPA raised §7607(d)(7)(B)'s procedural bar. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 pm
As fun as that'd be. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 1:36 pm
” [Universal City Studios v.] [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:05 pm
Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:11 pm
But roads that are a bit more expensive.P.S. - Washington State's best argument is, perhaps unfortunately, blocked by doctrine. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 3:24 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:35 am
Huet v Université de Bretagne Occidentale (Case C-251/11); [2012] WLR (D) 71 “National legislation which provided for conversion of fixed-term employment contracts into an employment contract of indefinite duration when the fixed-term employment contracts reached a certain duration did not have to require that the employment contract of indefinite duration reproduced in identical terms the principal clauses set out in the previous contract. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:15 pm
On December 14th, in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 10:26 am
In which, by the way, I think you'd be looking at a 5-4.That's my crystal ball for the day. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Burrage v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:19 am
The Court's ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:00 am
Zalewska v Department for Social Development (Child Poverty Action Group and another intervening) [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] WLR (D); [2008] WLR (D) 356 “The United Kingdom's decision to restrict the payment of welfare benefits for nationals of Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic (known collectively as the ‘A8 states’) to those who had worked an uninterrupted 12 months in… [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:39 am
Supp. 2d 183, 205 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 401 F. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:11 am
Cyrus D. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:56 pm
Because if justice was actually imposed, they'd probably be in jail, rather than simply owing State Farm some costs.Read the whole thing. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
In this set of short wins, the one that I'd like to call attention to is United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 12:18 pm
State v. [read post]
