Search for: "State v. David Harding"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Larry Lessig is clearly one of the most interesting and imaginative scholars within the legal academy, and he has written a book that fully vindicates the enthusiastic blurbs it receives (from myself, as well as others). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:36 am
Drafting Employment Agreements to Comply with New State Laws and Pending Legislation Restricting Enforceability of Non-Competes David J. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
Moreover, when the Board is indecisive even about deciding such a basic issues as whether a person engaged in case management should be on the presiding panel (which should be avoided at all costs, as is the case in the Federal Court as every experienced Federal Court lawyer knows well), it’s hard to imagine how the Board would be thinking about bringing in the concept of amicus curiae or “assessors” – which would be admittedly unusual but arguably within the realm… [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:59 am
Section II-A argued that the test of Lemon v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
” Larson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
The first was New York v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
But 170, though impressive, is far short of the 270 votes necessary to prevail in the electoral college, and the so-called “compact”—I put it that way in order to highlight the fact that it is not at all clear, as a legal matter, that the agreement by the relevant states would be legally enforceable in the absence of congressional approval, which might be very hard to attain, especially in the egregious Senate—will not kick in at all unless… [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
They have done so in Fort Bend County v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 11:34 pm
The Defendant (now in liquidation) did not show up to court and clearly stated that it had no intention of appearing either through the liquidators or the sole director and controlling mind.As the Defendant did not attend court, David Stone exercised his judicial discretion to strike out the Defence and Counterclaim. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:57 am
David Ben Gurion agreed to a service exemption for ultra-Orthodox men studying in yeshivot in the early days of the state of Israel. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
” State of Illinois v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Mathilde Pavis reviews Public rights – Copyright’s Public Domains by Graham Greenleaf and David Lindsay. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Hardwick in Lawrence v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
PatentsRose Hughes reports on the Supreme Court's decision that confirm no hard line on inventive step test in finding Cialis dosage patent obvious. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
And the state, either as the traditionally conceived apex of political order, or as the repository of large aggregations of power within an international state system, now serves as a (but not the) nexus point for the regulatory power of technique. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
Less familiar is a problem that is perhaps the obverse: plural and incompatible ways of generating claims to say “yes,” to give the final word on who shall rule and what the state shall do. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:51 pm
Hyatt, overruling Nevada v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am
Meanwhile, a proposal to break up California into three states nearly made it onto the ballot last November. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Look at expected uses v. unexpected uses? [read post]
