Search for: "State v. Dollar"
Results 481 - 500
of 9,556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
And, this excerpt refers to Democrat Thomas V. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Larceny, defined to be the theft of effects, personal property, or money, of the value of twenty-five dollars or more or the Czechoslovak equivalent. 18. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 7:13 pm
“The upcoming trial of United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 2:52 am
In Koock v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
Two million dollars, plus an apology, plus some other stuff. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:34 am
The decided case was Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 11:18 am
Law v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in McEwen v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Michel V. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 10:10 am
Practical Impact of Ford III The practical impact of this decision is that an order or judgment involving money must state the exact amount owed, in dollars and cents. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:14 am
The voters of Michigan will have their say about Justice Zahra this fall, but we can all vote with our dollars against State Farm. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:55 am
Beaty and Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 4:30 am
Stevenson v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:01 pm
In Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:02 am
At a theoretical level, the principle of fiscal federalism is implicated here, as a broad interpretation of the federal prohibition would represent an unprecedented degree of state entanglement in state fiscal policy, using federal dollars to dictate state policy in a way that vastly exceeds what has been attempted in the past. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am
It can cost upwards of a billion dollars, start to finish, to put a new drug on the market. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
— Alabama v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:26 pm
” Importantly, in State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm
Dollar General argues that this type of analysis is what led the Court to rule that tribal courts lacked power over non-Indians in criminal matters in Oliphant v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:41 am
Here's a civil rights case with the least sympathetic plaintiffs as possible, which is why they were awarded one dollar in damages, which the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Warren v. [read post]
