Search for: "State v. Dutch" Results 481 - 500 of 1,327
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2017, 9:15 am by Amy Howe
Royal Dutch Petroleum, but it ultimately resolved that case on another ground, holding that the ATS does not apply to violations that occur outside the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm by John Elwood
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider whether the act allows lawsuits against corporations, after the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am by Jelle Hoekstra
On 6 July 2015 Mr Oosting filed observations under Article 115 EPC regarding the validity of Agreement D19 under Dutch law (D23a).XI. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The Hague court ruled that WhatsApp is subject to Dutch privacy laws despite not having any establishments or presence in the EU. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm by Bill Marler
Beginning in September 2016, several states, CDC, and the FDA investigated a multistate outbreak of foodborne hepatitis A. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Alex van der Wolk and Ronan Tigner
To support its view, the court referred to works (on applicable law and apps on smart devices) of the Article 29 Working Party (WP29, a consortium of EU Member State DPAs) and to the European Court of Justice’s interpretation of the scope of EU privacy rules in the Google v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 5:45 am
Contents include:Chris Thomale, The forgotten discipline of private international law: lessons from Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum – Part 2 Horatia Muir Watt, Conflicts of laws unbounded: the case for a legal-pluralist revival Zia Akhtar, Act of State, state immunity, and judicial review in public international law Nicolás M. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 3:25 am by Xandra Kramer
Mr Justice Fraser stated that separate legal personality of the constituent entities of corporate group represents a fundamental principle of English law (at [92]) and claimants failed to provide evidence of high degree of control and direction by RDS sufficient to meet the three-fold test on the existence of duty of care set by Caparo Industries plc v Dickman and clarified by Chandler v Cape. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]