Search for: "State v. Epstein" Results 481 - 500 of 685
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2012, 1:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
InBanushi v Epstein ;2012 NY Slip Op 30123(U); ; January 11, 2012; Sup Ct, NY County; Docket Number: 402693/10; Judge: Doris Ling-Cohan "In May, 1998, Banushi hired Epstein to litigate a case that was already in progress. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:10 am by New Books Script
48 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 3 from 2012: Copy of order in Council. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm by Tom Smith
In Lochner's vacant place, I hereby recommend one such zero-arguments-for case, Griswold v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
Briefly: At this blog, Richard Epstein analyzes Wednesday’s decision in Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:41 am by Howard Wasserman
Friday, February 3 Panel I: Judicial Decisionmaking (Mentor: Lee Epstein) Margaret Thomas, The Federalism Canons of Statutory Interpretation as a Constraint on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Nancy Leong, Making Remedies Elizabeth McCuskey, Clarity and Clarification: Grable Federal Questions in the Eyes of Their Beholders Paul Gugliuzza, Patent Law's Uniformity Principle and the Consequences of Judicial Specialization  Panel II: Judicial Capacity and Executive Action (Mentor:… [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 5:22 am by Robert A. Epstein
  With that, it was almost coincidental that the Appellate Division just released a new unreported (not precedential) decision in Lowy v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 2:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
To that list, the brief could have added the gas station rent control measure in Lingle v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 7:38 am by Robert A. Epstein
Bringing us to the Appellate Division's newly unreported decision in Livingstone v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 10:22 am by Rosalind English
The one occasion where the disease itself and the state’s approach to it was the focus of the complaint was a Swedish case where the applicant complained that his compulsory isolation in hospital under the state’s infectious diseases legislation deprived him of his liberty contrary to Article 5 (Enhorn v Sweden (2005) 56529/00). [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Couvillion, Note, Defending for its life: ChampionsWorld LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:19 am by jpfaff
If Lee Epstein is right that there is little evidence on this topic, then Kennedy's opinion must reflect that. [read post]