Search for: "State v. Fontes"
Results 481 - 500
of 860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2013, 8:09 am
However, the employees were granted partial summary judgment on their state law claim that the surcharge was a tip under the NYLL following the effective date of the 2011 Regulations (Maldonado v BTB Events & Celebrations, Inc, November 22, 2013, Engelmayer, P). [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
In STATE, EX REL. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:11 am
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
” See Franciscan Vineyards, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 3:33 pm
Express Lien Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
”Because the University of Alabama is a state entity, it cannot be joined in a case in federal court. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:12 pm
Com o fim da Segunda Grande Guerra, expande-se o Estado de Bem-Estar Social na Europa e owelfare state nos EUA, que tinham por objetivo fundamental, dentre outros na área econômica, a diminuição da desigualdade social e da precária condição de vida dos pobres por meio de programas assistencialistas executados pelos agentes da mão esquerda do Estado[1]. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:12 pm
Com o fim da Segunda Grande Guerra, expande-se o Estado de Bem-Estar Social na Europa e owelfare state nos EUA, que tinham por objetivo fundamental, dentre outros na área econômica, a diminuição da desigualdade social e da precária condição de vida dos pobres por meio de programas assistencialistas executados pelos agentes da mão esquerda do Estado[1]. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:04 am
Chapman v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 9:14 pm
” In Harrington v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:02 am
Harris v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 10:36 pm
These are some of the findings and conclusions by the TTAB last week in the long-anticipated decision Sheetz of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:24 pm
Ray v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:27 am
The parties first disputed whether AT&T Mobility LLC v Concepcion applied to the general contract defense of unconscionability under state law. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 3:50 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Kiennitz v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:57 pm
P.F.V. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:28 am
An amendment should specifically overturn Kohl v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 7:50 pm
Robbins v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:07 am
In the district court, defendant AHRN moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, arguing that plaintiff MRIS did not own the copyrights in the photographs sued upon since the assignments between it and its subscribers were not memorialized in a signed writing as mandated by Section 204(a). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:33 am
Allen v. [read post]
