Search for: "State v. Gilbert" Results 481 - 500 of 822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2013, 9:44 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: RALPH LAVERNE HUNNICUTT-CARTER v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:53 am by Gilbert Brosky
Posted by Gilbert BroskyOn Second Thought… Court Begrudgingly Reverses Its Own June 2013 Decision On Class Arbitration In Light of SCOTUS’s Amex Decision Eight days prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 5:53 am
The Retirement and Social Security Law excludes “large raises having the effect of inflating the members final average salary” in determining the member’s retirement allowance Chichester v DiNapoli, 2013 NY Slip Op 05283, Appellate Division, Third Department Gilbert L. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:09 am by Don Cruse
TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION AND DON GILBERT, COMMISSIONER, No. 05-0372 , the Court held that an administrative rule the state had adopted to govern certain Medicaid reimbursements was invalid. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:05 pm
But actually this is about 2/6's APJ Gilbert's speaking out in court -- as the plaintiff in his own lawsuit Gilbert v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm by Mary Whisner
 As Isabel Wilkerson’s The Warmth of Other Suns did for the story of America’s black migration, Gilbert King’s Devil in the Grove does for this great untold story of American legal history, a dangerous and uncertain case from the days immediately before Brown v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
  He described the circuit split leading to FTC v Actavis currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]