Search for: "State v. Grey"
Results 481 - 500
of 531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm
Cranmer accepted a commission to write a propaganda treatise in the king’s interest, stating the course he proposed and defending it by arguments from Scripture, the Fathers, and the decrees of general councils. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 11:59 am
Both sides can appeal a decision to the Council (generally stating reasonable grounds such as procedure or new information). [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
Most recently, in 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in Reed v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su Âpreme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 5:41 pm
Some commentators believe that there is a risk that Congress, state legislatures, and state attorneys’ general will use the percentages of community benefit and uncompensated care in the Report to establish inflexible minimum community benefit standards similar to the minimum standards introduced by Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan in 2005, and which have repeatedly been proposed by Senator Charles Grassley. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
They state that, “It is impossible to define all types of activity which may be suitable for prosecution. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
” For years cryptocurrencies have occupied a relatively grey regulatory area. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:45 am
” McCool intended to leverage the fact that state court judges are elected to sway how the judges ruled. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
Important to note for client privacy purposes, a 501(c) (4) is not required to disclose the names of its donors.[13] However, depending on what state the 501(c)(4) operates, such information may be requested by such state, but public disclosure of donor information is still a grey area which is arguably invalid on federal or state constitutional grounds.[14] Florida does not currently expand any required federal disclosures, which may mean there is a desire by the… [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am
Shaun discusses the Second Circuit’s decision in Townsend v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:51 pm
Skolnick v. [read post]
9 Nov 2024, 12:32 pm
From Judge Terrence Berg's opinion on Election Day in ACLU of Mich. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm
Check out Scott Greenfield's post on Berghuis v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 10:01 am
The five categories of protected characteristics remain as those stated in the Interim Report, namely: (i) age, (ii) nationality, (iii) sex, marital status, pregnancy status, caregiving responsibilities, (iv) race, religion, language, and (v) disability and mental health conditions. [read post]
10 Jun 2025, 11:45 am
I much enjoyed this conversation with Kayla Ann Toney (First Liberty Institute), who was the prevailing lawyer in S.E. v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am
The Opponents had raised objections on the grounds of Articles 100(a) and (b) EPC.The evidence cited during the opposition procedure includesD1: WO 2007/087243 A2;D2: WO 2004/041982 A1;D3: EP 1 867 708 A1;D4: V. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Fictional memory, imaginary state of mind, imagined shopping experience—and then we complain that we don’t have ecologically valid evidence! [read post]
