Search for: "State v. Hatch" Results 481 - 500 of 795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2020, 11:08 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Responding to the invitation from the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General for the United States has filed an amicus brief for the United States in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USC Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:43 am by Julian Ku
Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) arbitral tribunal will release its long-awaited award in Philippines v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
For that matter, bye-bye those parts of Hatch-Waxman that allow the pervasive patent-related back and forth that occurs between generic and branded drug manufacturers. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
At Discourse, the UCLA Law Review’s online publication, Senator Orrin Hatch weighs in on the ACA subsidies case, King v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:30 am by Christine Corcos
Part V examines the intervention of a number of 3D printing companies in a Supreme Court of the United States dispute in Star Athletic v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:30 am
Part V examines the intervention of a number of 3D printing companies in a Supreme Court of the United States dispute in Star Athletic v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:46 am by Clerquette LeClerq
They banter about incorporation, and whether the Second Amendment applies to the States. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am by Erin Miller
(all) Amicus brief of the Cato Institute et al. (09-988) Amicus brief of eight states (09-991) Title: PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:12 am by Anna Christensen
Following Tuesday’s Second Circuit decision in Fox v. [read post]