Search for: "State v. Heal" Results 481 - 500 of 727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2013, 7:39 pm by Justin Levitt
  Which means that any jurisdiction covered in 2006 was either healed but didn’t overly mind the costs of preclearance … or was not sufficiently healed. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:51 am by Pádraig McAuliffe
” This is something no post-authoritarian or post-war state has ever succeeded in doing, owing to the fact that states are too weak, divided and have too many other priorities to deliver on such utopian programmes. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by A. Rahman Ford
Unlike the defendants in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:15 am by Jennifer Davis
” He also cited the earlier Court ruling in a similar case, Fletcher v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 9:12 am by Joy Waltemath
When he advised the employer that he wanted to return to work, the employer refused to allow his return until “he could demonstrate that he was 100 percent healed or had no restrictions. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:34 am by The Charge
  The offender may be charged fines to the state, [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Julia Spiegel
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:42 am by Florian Mueller
But patent trolls and app developers don't mix.The highest-profile patent dispute in the world, Apple v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm by Amy Howe
An intermediate state appellate court upheld the regulation, concluding that it is a “neutral and generally applicable” rule that can survive under the court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]