Search for: "State v. Hernandez"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,236
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2015, 6:43 am
Felipe Hernandez, No. 108,684 (Sedgwick)K.S.A. 21-2512 appealJanine CoxImproper summary denial of DNA testState v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
Hernandez, 778 F. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm
Ana Hernandez (D-Houston) for outstanding service to the State of Texas, and Judge Debra Ibarra Mayfield as top Latina attorney age “40” and younger. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 12:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003); Grutter v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 7:07 am
Lenovo (United States), Inc., 3-12-cv-01065 (ORD July 9, 2015, Order) (Hernandez, J.) [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:40 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC18919 - State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:50 am
PCC Structurals, Inc., June 4, 2015, Hernandez, M.). [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:35 am
Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010); Hernandez v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
T.B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994), and to strikes based on ethnic origin, see Hernandez v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:39 pm
ITS states that, in the last two weeks in April 2015, it discovered various anomalies in the Knox business. [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:18 pm
., v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:42 am
Judge Lauber further opined that even if the court assumed substantial compliance, the contribution was part of a quid pro quo exchange as defined in Hernandez v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:42 am
Judge Lauber further opined that even if the court assumed substantial compliance, the contribution was part of a quid pro quo exchange as defined in Hernandez v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:49 am
United States, 93 Fed. [read post]