Search for: "State v. Honda"
Results 481 - 500
of 520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861, 869 (2000), and applied that principle in our neck of the woods in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:29 pm
Northeastern State University). [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
" Buckman Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:30 pm
” “Your response is appreciated, but not sufficient in my mind,” Honda responded. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Katz Technology Licensing drops Covington & Burling as counsel (Law 360) Economic downturn = downturn in patent filings (PatentlyO) Challenging the strong presumption of patent validity (PatentlyO) USPTO Extends patent prosecution highway pilot with Australia and begins pilot with Germany (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions Jury awards Uniloc $388m in patent suit v Microsoft (Law 360) (IP Down Under) CAFC finds for Honda in defending truck bed patent… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
State Higher Educ. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 10:43 pm
The court quoted from Salomaa v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:22 am
” Lee v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Mich. 1987) ............................................................ 46 Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:09 pm
Is there a "reasonable person standard" that dictates your "average Joe" can't carry a gun if he wears Gap jeans and drives a Honda unless he has a permit, but an "affluent person standard" that states that if you are famous, drive a Mercedes or have some "bling," you don't need a permit? [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 7:18 am
However, Judge Stahl dissented on this point, offering a mini-treatise on the caselaw governing employer dress codes (Boch Imports, dba Boch Honda v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:10 am
Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Boyd v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
