Search for: "State v. Irish"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2017, 4:02 pm
But the differences with other European Union member states are even more striking, according to IPI research. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 5:16 pm
Related Cases: Google v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 8:31 am
The most prominent case in which an anti-suit injunction actually issued was Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am
Justice Black’s opinion in Afroyim v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 3:08 am
Supreme Court, in a June 2006 decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
It is difficult to conceive of a case that better fits this description than R (Miller & Anor) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:05 am
See Zheng v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
There was a report of the case on the Irish Legal News website. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
The News Media Association has said there are “grounds for judicial review” of the decision to recognise Impress as a state-approved press regulator. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
TJ McIntyre, a lecturer in the UCD Sutherland School of Law, has published an article in the Irish Independent entitled “Irish law needs urgent update for digital age to give worldwide users protection over data”. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am
As the U.K. government prepares itself for the beginning of Brexit negotiations in March 2017, it is becoming increasingly clear that there is no off-ramp—and, for that matter, no brakes on the car. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 9:50 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:13 am
This author was delighted to stumble upon the latest decision in the intriguing litigation between Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier when browsing through the recent list of Chancery decisions ([2016] EWHC 366 (Ch)). [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
Ireland In the case of Ryanair Ltd v Fleming ([2016] IECA 265) the Irish Court of Appeal held that the natural forum for a libel claim against an Australian pilot by Ryanair was Australia. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
InFacts v Daily Express. [read post]
