Search for: "State v. Lack" Results 481 - 500 of 39,988
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Slip op. at 8.[8] Referencing the “appearance and function” test it was rejecting, the Court noted that a social media site’s appearance and function could assume relevance at the second step, but “cannot make up for a lack of state authority at the first. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
The mother stated that in the first incident, the father “became angry, called her demeaning names, threw objects at her, and headbutted her while the child was at her feet” (BCCA at para 10). [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
While agreeing with much of the district court’s well-stated decision, we must reverse because we conclude the court lacked personal jurisdiction over MSC. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 7:44 am by Just Security
by Joana de Andrade Pacheco (@_JoanaPacheco) United Nations – Srebrenica Genocide Critical UN Move: Draft Resolution Confronts Genocide Denial in the Balkans by Leon Hartwell (@LeonHartwell) and Hikmet Karčić (@hikmet_karcic) Podcast: Presidential Immunity The Just Security Podcast: United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm
             In one case, State of Florida v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:07 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm by Patricia Hughes
Round Two: rehearing by the AHRC; an appeal from the AHRC’s 2020 decision (Amir and Siddique v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am by Josh Blackman
[The walls are closing on universal, non-party injunctions against state laws. ] Labrador v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
This time limit for filing a petition for reconsideration is jurisdictional, meaning that the Appeals Board lacks jurisdiction to act upon or consider an untimely petition for reconsideration ( Maranian v. [read post]