Search for: "State v. Lang" Results 481 - 500 of 768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2010, 3:25 am by Russ Bensing
A few weeks back I discussed State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:38 am by Brian Cordery
Obviousness The Judge rejected Takeda’s classical obviousness attack on the basis of skilled person’s motivation to actually make the product (something that is not relevant when considering novelty and the state of the art). [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Advanced Cell Diagnostics v Molecular Instruments [2024] EWHC 898 (Pat) On 23 April 2024, Mr Justice Meade handed down his judgment in the dispute between Advanced Cell Diagnostics (ACD) and Molecular Instruments (MI). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 5:18 am
Inc., 41 AD3d 259 [2007]; Skow v Jones, Lang & Wooten Corp., 240 AD2d 194 [1997], lv denied 94 NY2d 758 [1999]). [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
JPM for pre-BK enhancement of position http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Lehman-BK-SDNY-Peck-4-19-12.pdf … B-SDNY's Peck,J. in Lehman v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
There is also the vexed issue of the role of the Lange “political discussion” defence. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:38 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
Such a contractual approach is confirmed by the CJEU when it states that the parties must negotiate in good faith. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:31 am by Miquel Montañá
Over the years, this divergent state of affairs has been a source of legal uncertainty, which has not done patent owners and the public in general any good. [read post]