Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2013, 5:15 am
Netherlands (1979) 1 EHRR 647; Ozturk v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Sumption gave the main judgment. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
However, Lord Carnwath had two difficulties with this proposition. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 3:29 am
Even so, to benefit from this cash flow advantage, Lord Hodge states that the taxpayer must formally calculate his tax liability on the return itself; it is not enough simply to include the final figure as part of a covering letter. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:59 pm
I refer to the treatment of that decision by Lord Oliver of Aylmerton in A.G. v Guardian [1987] 1 WLR 1248 at 1319 D-E, referred to by Bingham LJ in the Court of Appeal in A.G. v Guardian Newspapers (No. 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 at 217C. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
Lord Sumption rejected this, stating that the directives leave various matters to member states to determine, but the domestic schemes were nonetheless part of a scheme for implementing an EU tax. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
To the objection that there was interest charged on the loan of the broker's fee, Lord Clarke says: Section 9(4) does not prohibit the charging of interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
To the objection that there was interest charged on the loan of the broker's fee, Lord Clarke says: Section 9(4) does not prohibit the charging of interest. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Dyson referred to the four-limb test for proportionality in respect of interference with Convention rights as espoused by Lord Reed in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No. 2) [2013] UKSC 39. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
It would be fair to say that the House of Lords judgment in the joined appeals in Birmingham v Ali and Moran v Manchester [2009] UKHL 36 has come as something of surprise. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:54 am
In Askew v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
College of Dental Surgeons of Puerto Rico v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:32 am
Considers whether the conditions of entitlement to State Pension Credit were compatible with Regulation 1408/71, which prohibits discrimination between nationals of different Member States. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 12:15 am
"Polonius: What do you read, my lord? [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
Starting on Monday 30 January 2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:06 pm
In last month’s unanimous judgment in Rothschild v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2013] EWCA Civ 197) the Court of Appeal upheld a decision that the defence of justification had been established in a claim brought by the financier Nat Rothschild against the Daily Mail. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:15 am
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the Secretary of State. [read post]
